Realty Law Digest

, New York Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

Scott E. Mollen discusses 'Greene v. Carson,' where HUD was only partly granted judgment in an action over denial of continued Section 8 subsidy and 'Capital One v. Karp,' where application of the doctrine of equitable mortgages warranted permitting reformation of CEMA.

This premium content is reserved for New York Law Journal subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202797264235

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.