Realty Law Digest

, New York Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

Scott E. Mollen, a partner at Herrick, Feinstein and an adjunct professor at St. John's University School of Law discusses 'Lavi v. Assa,' where a temporary receiver was appointed, as plaintiff might have lost equity interest in the subject property.

This premium content is reserved for New York Law Journal subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202796800110

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.