Letters to the Editor

Forensic Evaluators Must Articulate Bases for Opinions

By David A. Martindale |

David A. Martindale writes: Evaluators must recognize that they must be fully prepared to articulate the bases for their opinions.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents process unaccompanied children in Brownsville, Tx. Officials say that the impact of the situation along the border will ripple through the entire nation's Immigration Courts, including an already overburdened facility in New York.

Pro Bono Call to Action for Immigrant Youth

By Lenni B. Benson |

In the past two months, the New York Immigration Court has heard more than 1,500 initial hearings for children and mothers with small children placed into removal proceedings. Sadly, there is no right to appointed counsel (even for children) in the immigration courts.

'Mexico Leasing' Follows Precedent

By Paris Baldacci |

A recent letter stating that the Appellate Term, Second Department's decision in 'Mexico Leasing v. Jones' is inconsistent with controlling authority and, thus, contributes to a perception of uncertainty about regulation is wrong on both counts.

Falling Through Cracks: Non-Paying Parties in Arbitration

By Neil M. Eiseman |

There is a hole in our arbitral system and, without being overly dramatic, our state courts don't want to fix it. As it now stands, somebody can "game" the system simply by refusing to pay for their arbitrator.

Appellate Term's Inconsistent Rulings Cause Confusion

By Matthew Brett |

The Appellate Term, Second Department's decision on Oct. 8 in Mexico Leasing, LLC v. Jones, is a perfect example of the growing perception of uncertainty when it comes to decisions concerning rent regulation.

Blocking Access to Forensic Files Is Counterproductive

By David A. Martindale |

Endorsing a custody evaluator's opinion without having examined her file is akin to expressing confidence in the structural integrity of a building without having inspected the foundation.

Three children in silhouette

New York Behind in Access to Forensic Child Custody Files

By Jeffrey P. Wittmann |

New York continues to be a national embarrassment with its frequent, illogical insistence that the best way to help insure a determination of a child's best interests is to make it hard for parents (and children, through their attorneys) to have unfettered access to the full forensic files used as a basis for the often life-changing recommendations flowing from forensic evaluators.

Manhattan Supreme Court

40 Years of Delivering Equal Justice Under the Law

By Raun Rasmussen |

When the Legal Services Corporation was created in 1974, 12 percent of Americans had yearly incomes low enough to be eligible for free legal assistance. Now, 21 percent, or 65.5 million people, are eligible, and barely one in five low-income families are able to get access to legal assistance they need.

stack of credit cards

Research on Alternate Forms of Bail

By Mary T. Phillips |

The New York City Criminal Justice Agency has recently released the results of a study that examined the rate of return in regard to the newest alternative form of bail to be authorized: the use of a credit card.

Impact of 'Balsys' on Prosecutions Abroad

By Judith Feigin |

Lee Spielmann's article, "Denaturalization of Nazi Perpetrators: What Have We Learned?" references two U.S. Supreme Court decisions emanating from these cases. However there were in fact three and the one omitted is arguably the most far-reaching.

Rates of Return Under Alternative Bail Options

By Richard Montelione |

Although I am unaware of any research regarding the rate of return when alternate forms of bail are set by the court, it is interesting to postulate that the rate of return may be as high if not higher than cash or insurance company bond based on the success of micro-lending.

 jail cells

We Can Better Employ Bail Statute

By Joshua Norkin |

In his 2013 State of the Judiciary address, Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman called for "a top-to-bottom revamping of the rules governing bail in our state." Unfortunately, little has changed in the day-to-day functioning of arraignments in the wake of Lippman's call to action.

Burden of Proof in Parking Violation Cases

By Glen Bolofsky |

LeGaL Weighs In on Court of Appeals Appointments

By Janice B. Grubin and Meredith R. Miller |

While the LGBT community's historic exclusion and current underrepresentation in the state judiciary generally remains a concern, it is particularly problematic at the Court of Appeals. Our absence there, unfortunately, has been keenly reflected by precedential decisions over the years that relied upon discredited stereotypes and painful misunderstandings to reach legal conclusions very much adverse to our community members and their families.

Dangers of Coaching Parents in Custody Evaluations

By Paulette M. Selmi |

Small Claim Success Story

Videotaping's Effect On Clients

By Madeline Lee Bryer |

Rikers Bill Would Improve Criminal Justice System

By Joseph R. Lentol |

Comment Disparaged Matrimonial Bar

By Steven A. Leshnower |

Rent Overcharge Limitations Period Remains Untouched

By Darryl M. Vernon |

Given a Second Chance After Prostate Cancer

By Jeffrey Lebowitz |

Jeffrey Lebowitz writes about embarking on his long-delayed post judicial career.

Reichbach Would Find No Comfort Under Marijuana Law

By Emily Jane Goodman |

What Employers Should Know About Ramadan

By Atif Rehman |

There Is No Battle Over Surreptitious Taping of IMEs

By Timothy R. Capowski and Tiffany A. Miao |

Admissibility of Out Of State Affidavits

By Stephen Shapiro |

Service of Process to Virtual Office

By Nicole Hyland |

How Will 'Pro Bono' Be Defined?

By Kenneth H. Ryesky |

Religious Reference Without Context Is Offensive

By Alan S. Axelrod |

Diversity on Albany Bench

By William Little and Jennifer Corona |

Oh, When Will the School Board Ever Learn?

By Jay H. Berg |

Clarifying Related Case Opinions

By Burt Neuborne |

Why ABA Opinion on Jurors and Social Media Falls Short

By Mark A. Berman, Ignatius A. Grande and Ronald J. Hedges |