SEC's Administrative Enforcement Intensifies Fairness Debate
This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.
To view this content, please continue to LexisAdvance®.
Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via LexisAdvance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com
What's being said
-
It is fair to question the process, and it‘s fair to question the standard of proof, and it‘s even fair to criticize the choice of forum, but it is not fair or accurate to question the independence and integrity of federal administrative law judges.
While federal ALJs do not enjoy the same level of independence from removal that Article III judges enjoy, we do enjoy the protections of tenure from termination in the absence of good cause established by the agency after a hearing before the MSPB. While we are paid by the agency, our salaries are set by Congress, and agencies may not rate our performance, or or increase (or decrease) our compensation.
It is both inaccurate and misleading to imply that federal ALJs at the SEC or any other agency are somehow beholden to the agency because the agency processes their paycheck. Article III judges are paid by the United States government, paid by the United States treasury, but no educated lawyer would ever argue that because they receive their payment from the government they are biased toward the government. The premise is as ridiculous as it is without merit and is certainly unworthy of inclusion in a legal journal of this level.
Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.
Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202675574765
Thank you!
This article's comments will be reviewed.
ADD COMMENT