Judges and Lawyers Work to Understand Courtroom Science

, New York Law Journal


In an era when science is bombarding civil and criminal courts and judges are frequently asked to ponder theories posited by expert witnesses, more jurists are going back to school for crash courses in genetics and other sciences.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Appellate Squawk

    It‘s true that judges aren‘t scientists, but they‘re not gatekeepers either. Under the Frye standard, their job is to determine whether the expert testimony is based on a methodology accepted by reputable scientific professionals. The merit of the Frye test is precisely that it doesn‘t allow judges to pass on matters they know nothing about. When judges purport to pass on the reliability of scientific evidence - see, e.g., Justice Bernard Fried‘s resoundingly overruled decision precluding expert testimony on eyewitness identification - it merely shows that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202663797422

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.