Courts Offer Olive Branch on Pro Bono Rule

, New York Law Journal

   | 1 Comments

Several state court administrators at a forum Tuesday indicated their willingness to compromise on parts of a mandatory pro bono disclosure rule, surprising a cohort of the bar who has protested the rule for the past year.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • grifhunter

    Collect data for what?

    Access to justice is the province of all of society and in no way should any one occupation or class of people be singled out for doing the heavy lifting of funding or providing legal services.

    This "reporting" kerfuffle is more hand-wringing from justices and white shoe lawyers trying to pad their legacy at the expense of those not similarly situated.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202657077674

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.