Federal Standard Adopted in Fraud-on-the Court Conduct

, New York Law Journal

   | 1 Comments

Adopting a hard-line position against litigants who engage in deceitful and obstructionist conduct, the Court of Appeals on Thursday said judges can toss out a case when "clear and convincing" evidence shows that an individual attempted to dupe the court.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

Originally appeared in print as Judges Adopt Federal Standard to Address Fraud on the Court

What's being said

  • Ravi Batra

    Fraud upon the Court is a sin, that mocks the very purpose and essence of the Third Branch‘s covenant to society: merit-based dispute resolution. It is high time that our Court of Appeals laid down the law, so to speak, to outlaw this practice that has found shelter within the "sharp practice" of some coupled with incivility. This was an important milestone that was desperately needed.

    The next logical step is that for every such fraud-upon-the-court offender-lawyer, licence-discipline organs be necessarily activated. There is much too much liberty being taken with hiding the truth, that even Admiral Poindexter would blush.

    As for enterprise corruption, Testwell‘s misbehavior put public safety at risk well beyond that which is known, and the Court‘s clarification will chill future would-be Testwells. Glad DA Cy Vance, Jr. persisted.

    A proud day for New Yorkers with these twin reported decisions.

    Dated: May 9, 2014
    /s/
    Ravi Batra

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202654596813

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.