Lesbian Parent Denied Adoption Requested as Extra Caution

, New York Law Journal


However, DiMauro said it left his clients with an "uneasy feeling" because there were still jurisdictions "hostile" to gay marriage and same-sex adoptions.

DiMauro said he did not know if he could appeal the ruling, seeing no misapprehension of law or fact.

"It's meant to be a victory," DiMauro said of the ruling. "Because there's still tremendous discrimination against the gay and lesbian community, it's a bittersweet victory. Other jurisdictions have to recognize the decision for the victory it should be."

What's being said

  • not available

    (**...presumed the legal parent of a child **BORN** to a lawful wife)..

  • not available

    Had the Surrogate rule differently, it would imply that birth certificates are not sufficient as evidence of parentage. It seems extreme, but such a ruling could mean that all married fathers (under common law presumed the legal parent of a child for to a wife) would need to petition the court to affirm their parental status through adoption proceedings! The Surrogate was wise to prevent such a ludicrous outcome.

  • not available

    Interesting article. Completely unintelligible headline.

  • not available

    While in some sense logical, this decision is mistaken, in my view, because at present about 30 states do not recognize same-sex marriages and would not automatically recognize the parental status of the petitioner based solely on their same-sex marriage. However, it is well established that adoption decrees, as judicial records, are owed full faith and credit in other states, although there is some disagreement about how that recognition would be enforced (through state court action vs. federal court action). Granting an adoption on this kind of petition harms nobody and will likely provide important protection for travel through non-recognition jurisdictions.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202640196085

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.