Unintended Consequences of Medical Indemnity Fund

, New York Law Journal


Rosary A. Morelli, a partner at Morelli, Gerrard & Lassalle, and Matthew E. Kelly, an associate in the firm, write: Although the Medical Indemnity Fund has had the intended effect of reducing the amount of cash paid by hospitals with obstetrical units through settlement or trial, some unintended consequences have come to light in cases where one or more defendants settle, but other defendants choose to go to trial.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisAdvance® Here

Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

LexisAdvance® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisAdvance® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisAdvance® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Legaltech News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisAdvance® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202637038494

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.