Trustee Claim Against Bank in RMBS Suit Ruled Time-Barred

, New York Law Journal

   |0 Comments

A plaintiff trustee is time-barred from pursuing a repurchase claim against the sponsoring bank of a residential mortgage loan securitization due to the six-year statute of limitations for breach of contract actions, a unanimous Appellate Division, First Department panel ruled Thursday.

In a reversal of a May 14 ruling by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Shirley Kornreich (See Profile), a four-judge panel held in Ace Securities v. Deutsche Bank Structured Products, 650980/2012, that the statute of limitations for repurchase actions in mortgage-backed securities litigation begins on the closing date of the purchase agreement, not on the date the demand for repurchase was made and rejected.

The trustee in this action sued Deutsche Bank, the sponsoring institution, for breach of representations and warranties of the quality of underlying mortgage loans included in a 2006 securitization. The trustee alleges it suffered more than $330 million in losses on non-performing mortgage loans and argued the sponsor should repurchase those loans.

Deutsche Bank argued that the breach of contract action was untimely since it was filed more than six years after the signing of the mortgage loan purchase agreement.

The First Department's unsigned opinion settles a conflict that arose in the Commercial Division earlier this year when Kornreich and Supreme Court Judge O. Peter Sherwood (See Profile), just days apart, reached differing conclusions on the statute of limitations issue. In Nomura Asset Assurance v. Nomura Credit & Capital, 653541/2011, Sherwood held in a May 10 decision that the statute of limitations in repurchase claims runs from the closing date of the mortgage loan purchase agreement.

The appellate panel, consisting of Justices Peter Tom (See Profile), Richard Andrias (See Profile), Leland DeGrasse (See Profile) and Rosalyn Richter (See Profile), said the trial court in Ace "erred in finding that plaintiff's claims did not accrue until defendant either failed to timely cure or repurchase a defective mortgage loan."

"To the contrary, the claims accrued on the closing date of the MLPA, March 28, 2006, when any breach of the representations and warranties contained therein occurred," the decision stated.

The statute of limitations issue is a common thread in at least a dozen other pending RMBS put-back actions collectively involving several billions of dollars in the Commercial Division. Thursday's appellate ruling throws the future of those actions in doubt.

David Woll, partner at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, counsel to Deutsche Bank in the Ace matter, declined to comment.

Counsel for the trustee in Ace, Marc Kasowitz of Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman, said "We respectfully disagree with the First Department's decision. Justice Kornreich's decision was well-reasoned and thorough and should have been upheld. We are confident the First Department's decision will be reversed on appeal."

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202634124074

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.