'Sekisui' Shakes Up Sanctions Analysis for Evidence Spoliation

, New York Law Journal


In their Federal E-Discovery column, H. Christopher Boehning and Daniel J. Toal of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison write: There is an encouraging trend of courts determining the propriety of sanctions for spoliation of electronically stored evidence with reference to the proposed amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e). Judge Shira Scheindlin has recently weighed in on the future of sanctions for the destruction of evidence, however, and expressed serious reservations about the proposed changes to Rule 37(e).

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Best

    Navigating the legal field is what people hire lawyers to do. Any non-lawyer can read and follow clear rules; but the law is more than a set of clear rules and judges are not just computers. Enormous amounts of lawyer time and taxpayer money has been spent on the quest for clear discovery rules where one size fits all and settles all disputes. Before and since that Quixotic Quest, Judges throughout the country have resolved discovery disputes including ESI issues for years using competing discovery concepts, factual analysis, experience, judgment, common sense, intelligence, reasoning etc. Judge Scheidlin decided Zubulake issues without new rules. She seems to realize that the answer to discovery is not in the rules but in the players---lawyers and judges--- and the facts. Today, when participants do not follow existing rules, the rulemakers think the solution is in more rules saying we really mean it.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202621435730

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.