Examining Disparate Impacts of Foreclosure Actions

, New York Law Journal

   |1 Comments

Solo practitioner Philip Grant writes: The Appellate Division, Second Department's decision in 'HSBC Bank USA v. Taher' reaffirms a policy in foreclosure actions, which, although ethnically neutral on its face, may nevertheless exacerbate ethnic and economic disparity among New Yorkers' home ownership rights.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • NY Attorney

    How did this get past the editor?

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202616594314

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.