Judges Decline to Order Warrant for Use of GPS in Civil Matters

, New York Law Journal

   | 3 Comments

A deeply divided state Court of Appeals held yesterday that the government can attach a GPS tracking device to a public employee's personal vehicle without a warrant, establishing what three judges called a "dangerous precedent."

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Freemom

    What if his wife or daughter used the car during the business day?

  • Mad Hominem

    where would one obtain a warrant in a no-action-pending, civil, administrative matter ?

  • anthony

    its amazing how some of the more 'qualified' judges just get it wrong...in a big way.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202608768783

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.