Circuit Finds Blogger Issued 'True Threat' Against Judges

, New York Law Journal

   | 4 Comments

Two Second Circuit judges said the evidence at trial was sufficient to prove that Harold Turner's blog post saying that the Seventh Circuit judges who upheld a Chicago gun ban deserved to die was unprotected by the First Amendment.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to LexisAdvance®.

Continue to LexisAdvance®

Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via LexisAdvance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Jerri Cook

    I'm uncomfortable with the majority's reasoning here. Declaring that someone deserves to die is a far cry from actively calling for their murder. Perhaps praying for another's demise will be the next unprotected speech.

  • suebrew

    The Indiana Supreme Court has set oral arguments in the Dan Brewington case for September 12, 2013. Brewington is a blogger who was sentenced to 5 years for blogging about Judge James D. Humphrey, Dearborn County, Indiana. Brewington was convicted of a D felony for Intimidating a Judge. For more information see http://danbrewington.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-following-is-letter-that-is-being.html
    The Freedom of Speech issue is similar but the content of Brewington's remarks and Indiana's definition of true threat is quite different from US v. Turner.

  • suebrew

    The Indiana Supreme Court has set oral arguments in the Dan Brewington case for September 12, 2013. Brewington is a blogger who was sentenced to 5 years for blogging about Judge James D. Humphrey, Dearborn County, Indiana. Brewington was convicted of a D felony for Intimidating a Judge. For more information see http://danbrewington.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-following-is-letter-that-is-being.html
    The Freedom of Speech issue is similar but the content of Brewington's remarks and Indiana's definition of true threat is quite different from US v. Turner.

  • Pete F

    Too bad these judges weren't of the same opinion when Alec Baldwin went screaming that somebody should track down and kill Cong.Hyde and his family and kill them.

    It's a good thing they can't put you in jail for what you are thinking,.....but they are thinking about finding a way to do just that.

    In this country you pretty much have a right to say most anything. You also have a right to be as stupid as you can possibly be and not commit a crime.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202607976200

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.