Clermont York Associates v. Zgodny

Landlord/Tenant Law

New York Law Journal


Judge Jack Stoller

Landlord sued to recover possession of the rent-stabilized apartment from tenant Zgodny in this summary suit for non-payment of rent. The parties entered into a stipulation and tenant consented to a final judgment based on a $4,150 monthly rent. Zgodny now moved to vacate the stipulation arguing he was unaware of a potential rent overcharge defense. The court stated a pro se party demonstrated grounds for vacating a stipulation in a non-payment summary suit by showing a meritorious defense, including rent overcharge. It noted the base date was four years before the filing of an overcharge claim. Yet, 72A Realty Assoc. v. Lucas held that deregulation of a rent-stabilized apartment in a J-51 tax abatement building before the Roberts v. Tishman-Speyer Properties ruling, along with a lack of clarity as to establishment of a vacancy rent at a level meriting luxury deregulation warranted examination of any available rental history necessary to set the proper base date rent. The court noted landlord's submission of individual apartment improvements to warrant a rent increase were insufficient to rebut the proposition that tenant set forth a "potentially meritorious" rent overcharge defense. Hence, it granted the motion, vacating the stipulation and judgment.

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202586891311

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.