• SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
  • 7761
  • Jan 17 2013 (Date Decided)
  • Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, DeGrasse, Rom├ín, JJ.
7761. QUOIZEL, INC., Plaintiff-resap, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellantres — Rivkin Radler LLP, Uniondale (Cheryl F. Korman of counsel), for appellant-res — Wilkofsky, Friedman, Karel & Cummins, New York (Harry A. Cummins of counsel), for res-res — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered November 14, 2011, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment on its complaint seeking the difference between the amount defendant paid it on its property damage claim, i.e., the cost of replacement, and the selling price of the damaged property, affirmed, without costs.

This premium content is reserved for New York Law Journal subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now