- SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
- Jan 13 2013 (Date Decided)
- Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Saxe, Richter, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
8944. KEVIN EDWARDS, plf-res, v. BP/CG CENTER I, INC. Defendantsres-ap, TEMCO SERVICES INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant-res — BP/ CG CENTER I, INC. Third-Party plfres v. PRO-QUEST SECURITY, INC., Third Party Defendant-res-res — Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, New York (Steven B. Prystowsky of counsel), for Temco Service Industries, Inc., appellant-res — Raven & Kolbe LLP, New York (Ryan E. Dempsey of counsel), for BP/CG Center I, Inc., BP/CG Center II, Inc., and Boston Properties Limited Partnerships, respondentsappellants/ res — Havkins, Rosenfeld, Ritzert & Varriale LLP, Mineola (Gail I. Ritzert of counsel), for Pro-Quest Security, Inc., res-res — Law Offices of Douglas A. Emanuel, South Salem (Richard G. Monaco of counsel), for Kevin Edwards, res — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered February 7, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against them, and denied third-party defendant Pro-Quest Security, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant Pro-Quest's motion as to the third-party causes of action except for the cause of action for common-law indemnification of defendant/third-party plaintiff Temco Services Industries, Inc., and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
This premium content is reserved for New York Law Journal subscribers.
Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.
Already a subscriber? Log in now