Mortgage Lending Enforcement Invokes Old Tool With New Theories

, New York Law Journal


Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson's William F. Johnson writes that although the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, passed at the height of the savings and loan crisis, had been largely idle in the prosecutor's playbook for two decades, new subpoenas reflect a growing trend of increased reliance on the older statute. An examination of these cases raises questions about the government's emerging new theories, which appear to have turned FIRREA on 
its head.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202583038513

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.