Summary Judgment and Timing of Expert Disclosure

, New York Law Journal


In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas A. Moore, senior partner at Kramer, Dillof, Livingston & Moore, and Matthew Gaier, a partner at the firm, write that in recent years, a question has been raised as to whether expert affidavits submitted on summary judgment motions should be rejected if an expert disclosure under CPLR 3101(d) was not served prior to the filing of the note of issue.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

  • Steve Lubowitz

    Thanks for the article. Hopefully it will clear up any confusion.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202580137903

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.