No Per Se Rule Governs Single-Color Trademarks in the Fashion Industry

, New York Law Journal

   |0 Comments

In their Second Circuit review, Martin Flumenbaum and Brad Karp, partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, discuss Christian Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent, where even though the panel found that Louboutin's mark had acquired secondary meaning as a brand identifier, this secondary meaning was limited only to designs in which the outsole of the shoe contrasted in color with the rest of the shoe.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202577098289

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.