Use of Retrospective Testimony in Special Education Hearings

, New York Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

Marion M. Walsh, an attorney with Littman Krooks and a certified Impartial Hearing Officer for children with disabilities, analyzes a recent Second Circuit decision that set an important precedent in tuition reimbursement cases, under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, ruling that, in evaluating an Individualized Education Program for a student with a disability, courts and administrative officers must examine an IEP prospectively as of the time of its creation.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202574371076

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.