Establishing Prima Facie Case in No-Fault Litigation

, New York Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

Jeff Henle, principal attorney at the Law Office of Jeff Henle, writes that as no-fault providers apprehended the boon brought by moving for summary judgment, the Civil Courts became inundated with such motions. The burden on no-fault providers was light, and there was little downside in moving for summary judgment. But since 2006, the courts have systematically increased a no-fault provider's burden in establishing its prima facie case.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to LexisAdvance®.

Continue to LexisAdvance®

Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via LexisAdvance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202568710956

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.