U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Two Police Canine Cases in Fall Term

, New York Law Journal


John J. Ensminger, who practices law in Stone Ridge, New York, and L.E. Papet, the executive director of K9 Resources, write that the high court is set to consider whether probable cause is needed to conduct a front-door sniff and whether, to establish probable cause for a vehicle search following a dog's alert, the prosecution must present complete field records for the dog, not just its training and certification records.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202566497670

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.