Expert Testimony on False Confessions and Territorial Limits of Donnelly Act

, New York Law Journal


In their New York Court of Appeals Roundup, Roy L. Reardon and Mary Elizabeth McGarry, partners at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, analyze, among other rulings, a decision where the Court construed the Donnelly Act, New York's version of the Sherman Act, and reached two significant conclusions. First, to survive a motion to dismiss a plaintiff must allege market power in the relevant market in which defendants are alleged to have restrained trade. Second, an overseas conspiracy must have a very close nexus to harm to competition in the state for it to fall within the reach of New York's statute.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202549228208

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.