Corporate Update

Circuit Addresses Limits of Fair Use in Visual Art

, New York Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

Meir Feder, a partner at Jones Day, and Rajeev Muttreja, an associate with the firm, write that Judge Batts's decision in Cariou v. Prince set out a strikingly narrow understanding of copyright's fair use doctrine, by holding that a creative work that makes use of another, preexisting work can qualify as "transformative" (and thus likely to be a permissible fair use) only if it refers to or comments on the older work.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202498908531

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.