Security Finding Required Before Use Of Stun Belt at Trial

, New York Law Journal

A judge must put a finding of specific security concerns on the record when ordering a defendant to wear a "stun belt" in court, even though the restraining device is not visible to the jury, the state Court of Appeals ruled yesterday. Judges also gave Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo a victory in his office's investigation of the "life settlement" providers and brokers who deal in the purchases of life insurance policies from living people for investment purposes. And they ruled invalid a New York City police officer's inventory search of a vehicle that included a look through the contents of the car's trunk.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com