Outside Counsel

Conflict Between CPLR and Bankruptcy Code: A Dilemma for Lenders

, New York Law Journal

   | 1 Comments

Nicole E. Schiavo discusses the conflict between New York's legislation requiring mandatory settlement conferences in foreclosure actions and the Bankruptcy Code's prohibition against a creditor taking any act that can be construed as trying to collect a discharged debt from a debtor. Thus, if a foreclosure action is commenced against a borrower who previously received a discharge on their mortgage loan debt, the lender is left with a "Catch 22": comply with the CPLR and risk violating the Discharge Injunction, or vice versa.

This premium content is reserved for New York Law Journal subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

  • F.H. La Guardia

    Virulently anti-business New York works perpetually to screw the capitalists who pay virtually all taxes and otherwise make possible our relatively high standard of living.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202795316044

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.