Can Capital Gain Rates Apply to Income From Phantom Stock?

, New York Law Journal


In their Taxation column, Elliot Pisem and David Kahen discuss 'Hurford Investments No. 2 v. Commissioner', which underscores the continued potential for confusion as to the consequences of transfers of compensatory rights in non-arm's length transactions, and continued uncertainty regarding the scope of §1234A.

This premium content is reserved for New York Law Journal subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202789770518

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.