Southern District Civil Practice Roundup

Shrinking Grounds for General Jurisdiction After 'Daimler'

, New York Law Journal


In their Southern District Civil Practice Roundup, Edward M. Spiro and Judith L. Mogul write that the Supreme Court's recent decision in 'Daimler v. Bauman,' calls into question whether certain long-held assumptions about the reach of New York's general jurisdiction statute are consistent with due process, and its impact is already evident in decisions from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202667964742

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.