Two Newest Top Court Judges Often Take Different Stands

, New York Law Journal


Over the past year, the Court of Appeals' newest judges, Jenny Rivera and Sheila Abdus-Salaam, have frequently found themselves on the opposite sides of cases, usually criminal appeals, articulating not only a difference of opinion on the results, but also on how those results should be reached.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

Originally appeared in print as Two Newest Court of Appeals Judges Often Take Different Stands, Especially on Criminal Cases

What's being said

  • Ravi Batra

    Judges Jenny Rivera and Shelia Abdus-Salaam represent two of the best official acts of Governor Andrew Cuomo. That his appointments cause enhanced honest intellectual tension on the Court serves to heighten the nuance-rich debates as well as recalibrate the Opinions to better serve our society.

    Like his father, Gov. Mario Cuomo, Gov. Andrew Cuomo‘s appointments and designations to the Judiciary have promoted greater excellence on the bench. Cuomo I used to appoint Democrats and Republicans, Upstaters and Downstaters. Cuomo II seems to have embellished on that rich and noble family tradition by appointing divergent view-holding jurists to maximize independence and intellectual tension - the necessary predicate for doing greater justice more often - even from the great and reluctant Holmes.

    New York will remain in Gov. Andrew Cuomo‘s debt for his diverse and superior judicial appointments - the benefit will flow to our children‘s children even as it makes New York‘s courts our nation‘s envy!

    Dated: 7/30/14
    Ravi Batra

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202665261532

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.