Outside Counsel

Attorney Fees and Real Estate: Discretion Has its Limits

, New York Law Journal


Nativ Winiarsky writes that however important '433 Sutton Corp. v. Broder' is to the landlord-tenant community as one of the relatively few such cases addressed per year by the Court of Appeals, it unfortunately provides little in the way of guidance in terms of the circumstances in which a court may use its discretion to deny attorney fees in the face of a valid lease clause allowing for same.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

Originally appeared in print as Attorney Fees and Real Estate: Discretion Has its Limitations

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202663318213

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.