Complex Litigation

Attorney Profanities, Surreptitious Recordings

, New York Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

In his Complex Litigation column, Michael Hoenig writes: Assume heated, contentious litigation ensues between opposing counsel. During a squabble over discovery, Attorney A, in an e-mail, calls her adversary a rather common, vulgar profanity that describes a portion of the anatomy. She also uses the crude words "sh--" and "fu--" in an admonition to him not to build a record for filing some unmeritorious motion, and that she has "everything taped" so that the recordings will be used to blunt such a tactic. Does such conduct justify court intervention?

Originally appeared in print as Attorney Profanities, Surreptitious Recordings Can Have Consequences

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202662999442

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.