Judge Rebuffs Bid for Jury by Ex-AIG CEO in State Suit

, New York Law Journal


Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Charles Ramos ruled that the two claims remaining in the drawn-out civil fraud case against Hank Greenberg and his co-defendant, former AIG CFO Howard Smith, for disgorgement and injunctive relief, do not provide a right to trial by jury.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • ColorBlindJustice

    What don‘t you understand about mobbed up hypocrisy, Sid? New York‘s anti-business, redistributionist left -- the same crowd that routinely invokes the "little guy‘s" right to a jury trial when defending the lawsuit industry that bankrolls its candidates‘ political campaigns -- doesn‘t trust 12 little guys/gals to return a verdict against Mr. Greenberg, upon which it has so much is riding.

    Just as the Affordable Care Act can be amended dozens of times without Congress‘s say-so, or some illegal aliens can be made legal with an executive order, or the IRS can be sicced on political opponents, the agenda of Schneiderman and his goons doesn‘t have to comport with any traditional sense of the law. And their pathetically transparent stooge Judge Ramos certainly isn‘t about to uphold the law if there‘s a chance that doing so might ultimately expose New York‘s nearly decade-long political persecution of Hank Greenberg for what it has been.

  • Sid

    Does not seeking disgorgement mandate a finding (by a finder of fact) of at least one finding of a criminal act with scienter? If so, is not a jury trial the law‘s default position? How can that be refused by the court? Of course, injunctive relief is for the court. I don‘t understand. Does anyone?

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202653372684

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.