A Footnote to Pro Bono
Apparently lost in the pro bono controversy is the substantial time already spent by members of the profession to materially improve, in one way or another, the quality of the profession. These time consuming efforts can take many different forms. These include, but are not limited to, lectures and pro bono presentations to members of the profession, the writing of articles on legal subjects published in recognized legal journals and periodicals, active participation in law related professional associations such as the New York State Bar Association, and active participation on one or more committees authorized by the chief judge or an Appellate Division. Such activities in one way or another undeniably improve the quality of the legal profession and the quality of the legal services rendered by the profession.
This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.
Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber?
LexisAdvance® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisAdvance® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisAdvance® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Legaltech News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisAdvance® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org