In the Matter of the Application of Glen Fox, Petitioner v. The New York City Department of Education, Respondent, 101263/13 April 28, 2014 | 1 Comments share share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. print reprints Supreme Court, New York County Justice Schlesinger Firing School Counselor Found Too Harsh a Penalty VIEW COMMENTS ( 1 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions Betsy Combier, paralegal Apr 27, 2014 The manner in which this Arbitrator was chosen and was able to proceed without proper determination of probable cause voted on in an Executive Session pursuant to Education Law 3020-a(2)(a) (i.e. there was no Executive Session) resulted in the biased Opinion and Award against Mr. Fox by Lana Flame. Neither NYSUT nor the Department of Education recognize this well-known procedural error in NYC cases and thus permit personal opinions to become conclusions of fact. Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202652602823 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.