Workers' Comp Benefits Survive Incarceration

, New York Law Journal


A workers' compensation recipient did not forfeit his entitlement to benefits when he was convicted of first-degree sexual abuse and sentenced to 10 years probation, an upstate appeals court determined.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

  • The reporter has the facts wrong. Read the 3-page decision. Mr. Islam was never considered an illegal immigrant. He was always a legal permanent resident. Because of his felony conviction, he was detained by ICE in 2009 pending a hearing to decide whether he should be deported for committing a felony as a legal permanent resident. Standard procedure. The issue was whether Mr. Islam‘s detainment by ICE as a direct result of his conviction of a felony constituted an incarceration “upon conviction of a felony” that rendered him ineligible to receive benefits during the period of his detention pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 10(4). Plain statutory interpretation. The Court read the statute narrowly to hold that § 10(4) only applies when a claimant is sentenced to incarceration as punishment for a felony conviction.

    Re: the last comment, benefits are not withheld pending an Appellate Division appeal.

  • What was this case brought ? A plain reading of the case facts and NY law would have lead to the conclusion that benefits were due, as confirmed by an unaminous decision. Simply an opportunity by the other side for a windfall by withholding benefits.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202651041125

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.