Ruling on Mold Clarifies 'Reliability' Needed From Experts

, New York Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

In his Complex Litigation column, Michael Hoenig, a member of Herzfeld & Rubin, writes: Just two weeks ago, the New York Court of Appeals issued its key decision in 'Cornell v. 360 W. 51st St. Realty,' yet again offering detailed guidance to bench and bar on a variety of expert reliability issues. Although the court's approach generally tracks 'Parker v. Mobil Oil,' there are additional lessons of note.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

Originally appeared in print as Cornell Ruling on Mold Clarifies 'Reliability' Needed from Experts

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202650815025

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.