Strategy on Extreme Emotional Disturbance

, New York Law Journal


In his Criminal Law and Procedure column, Barry Kamins, a Supreme Court Justice and administrator for the New York City Criminal Court, analyzes a recent Court of Appeals case holding that should a prosecutor choose to offer evidence sufficient to warrant charging a jury on the defense of extreme emotional disturbance, the defendant can obtain a charge from the court without having to present his own evidence and without having to file statutory notice pursuant to CPL 250.10.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

Originally appeared in print as Court of Appeals Addresses Strategy on Extreme Emotional Disturbance

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202649861770

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.