Smokers Fight City Over E-Cigarette Ban

, New York Law Journal


Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker Harassment argues that the Smoke-Free Air Act was designed to protect the public from exposure to second-hand smoke and cannot be extended to cover electronic cigarettes which do not emit smoke.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

  • Atticus Finch

    I am amused by a populace that buys into the hype that something not fully tested isn‘t harmful to them, and that it‘s ok to do it until they hear otherwise. I wonder how many would feel the same if they knew the active ingredient in the chemical compound that they "vape" is basically embalming fluid.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202648308325

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.