Separate Entity Rule on Bank Branches and Judgment Debtors

, New York Law Journal


Daniel B. Goldman and Adam W. Braveman of Paul Hastings write that for over 50 years in proceedings to enforce judgments in New York, New York branches of banks have been considered separate entities from all foreign branches. This rule has prevented judgment creditors from forcing banks to restrain and/or turn over assets of a judgment debtor held by foreign branches of banks. That may now change.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

Originally appeared in print as Resolving Separate Entity Rule on Bank Branches and Judgment Debtors

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202646188965

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.