Factual Disagreements Between Trial and Appellate Courts

, New York Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

In their Appellate Practice column, Thomas R. Newman, of counsel to Duane Morris, and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, examine 'Rocky Point Drive-In v. Town of Brookhaven,' in which the Court of Appeals granted the appellant's motion for leave to appeal in a case involving different factual findings of the trial court and Appellate Division on the same record, but limited its review to which factual findings more nearly comported with the weight of the evidence.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

Originally appeared in print as Review of Factual Disagreements Between Trial and Appellate Courts

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202645838875

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.