Overt Acts, Conspiracy and the Statute of Limitations

, New York Law Journal


In their Second Circuit Review, Paul Weiss' Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp discuss 'United States v. Grimm,' in which the court considered whether routine payments by unindicted co-conspirators pursuant to guaranteed investment contracts constituted overt acts in furtherance of a conspiracy for purposes of the statutes of limitations.

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202640466063

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.