Overt Acts, Conspiracy and the Statute of Limitations

, New York Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

In their Second Circuit Review, Paul Weiss' Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp discuss 'United States v. Grimm,' in which the court considered whether routine payments by unindicted co-conspirators pursuant to guaranteed investment contracts constituted overt acts in furtherance of a conspiracy for purposes of the statutes of limitations.

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202640466063

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.