Sitting Out: Recusals Mount Among the Justices

Financial disclosure forms offer some insight, but questions linger.

, The National Law Journal

   |0 Comments

Justice Samuel Alito on top of the steps of the Supreme Court.
Justice Samuel Alito on top of the steps of the Supreme Court.

Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly identified the federal district court where Charles Breyer, whose brother is Justice Stephen Breyer, is a judge. Charles Breyer sits on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

The growing pace of recusals by U.S. Supreme Court justices this term is fueling new concern about the court's ability to function at full strength.

Justice Samuel Alito Jr. has recused himself 52 times since the term began in October, a pace that could exceed his roughly 70 recusals last term. Most appear to have been triggered by his inheritance of stock in companies that are parties before the court — though many of the conflicts are not obvious from his most recent financial disclosure form. In most of the recusals, Alito bowed out of decisions that denied review of petitions before the court.

"Fifty-two recusals to this point in the term is an astounding number, regardless of how many of the cases were granted," said James Sample, a judicial ethics expert at the Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University. "While justices holding individual stocks is not new, it may be that the extent and reach of those individualized holdings, in certain instances, is now great enough to risk diminishing the finite public resource" of the court as a nine-justice institution.

American University Washington College of Law professor Amanda Frost, who has written about Supreme Court ethics, agreed. "If Alito inherited the money, then it might have been hard for him to immediately sell it, so I think he should be given a reasonable amount of time to do so," she said. "But all the justices should make an effort to avoid such conflicts."

Alito is not the only justice stepping aside. Justice Elena Kagan has recused herself more than twice as often as Alito so far this term — 113 times — but almost all appear to be explained by her involvement in the cases as U.S. solicitor general before she joined the court in 2010. Last term, for the same reason, Kagan recused herself 220 times.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor has recused herself 31 times this term, almost all in cases that came from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, where she was a judge before joining the Supreme Court in 2009.

SITTING OUT

A small number of the justices' recusals represent multiple actions taken at several stages of the same case. But still, the overall numbers are large enough to affect some of the cases in which the court has granted review — not just the thousands of petitions the court turns down every year.

The most prominent example this term is POM Wonderful v. Coca-Cola Co., an important Lanham Act case challenging the accuracy of a label for a pomegranate product made by Coca-Cola's Minute Maid brand. When the court granted review on Jan. 10, it announced that both Justice Stephen Breyer and Alito "took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition." That is the standard language that signals a justice's recusal.

As a result, when the case is argued, probably in April, two seats on the court will be empty and seven justices, not the usual nine, will decide the outcome.

According to their most recent financial disclosures — released last summer and reporting their assets as of 2012 — neither Alito nor Breyer reported owning Coca-Cola stock. (POM Wonderful Holdings LLC is not publicly held.)

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202639866149

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.