Southern District Civil Practice RoundupEdward M. Spiro and Judith L. Mogul, New York Law Journal
Under 'Daubert', It Isn't Getting Easier to Find a 'Reliable' Expert Witness
In their Southern District Civil Practice Roundup, Edward M. Spiro and Judith L. Mogul, write: Almost 25 years after the Supreme Court's decision in 'Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals', recent cases in the Southern District of New York continue to demonstrate the wide latitude that the Daubert standard affords to judges ruling on the admissibility of expert testimony, even on subjects previously accepted as valid grounds for expert opinion.
This premium content is reserved for New York Law Journal subscribers.
Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.
Already a subscriber? Log in now