Outside Counsel

Proximate Cause and Intervening Acts: 'Hain v. Jamison'

, New York Law Journal


George M. Heymann discusses the Court of Appeals' recent holding in 'Hain v. Jamison,' where the court said it could not be determined, as a matter of law, whether the farm's negligence in allowing a calf to escape merely furnished the occasion for the accident that killed a woman who was struck after she exited her car to help the calf, or that the accident did not flow from farm's negligent conduct. Accordingly, the issues of "substantial cause" and "foreseeability," under these circumstances, should be made by the fact finder.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202779918374

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.