High Frequency Trading After Barclays: What's Next?

, New York Law Journal


In his Corporate Securities column, John C. Coffee Jr., the Adolf A. Berle Professor of Law at Columbia University Law School and Director of its Center on Corporate Governance, writes: The transition to dark pools, high frequency trading, and the maker/taker model has come since the adoption of Regulation NMS in 2007. That is one cause, but not the deepest cause. With the privatization of securities markets, markets are no longer self regulators in any meaningful sense, but instead are aggressive profit maximizers. That cannot be changed, but it states the case for closer regulation.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisAdvance® Here

Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisAdvance® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisAdvance® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisAdvance® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Legaltech News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisAdvance® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202663439339

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.