A unanimous panel of the Second Department has rebuked in unusually sharp terms Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Arthur Schack for ignoring "binding precedent" and "improperly" relying on material he gathered from independent research.
Panel Cautions Judge, Revives Foreclosure Proceeding
New York Law Journal
March 22, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The New York Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.