Rent Overcharge: Supreme Court Tackles Four-Year Rule

In their Rent Regulation column, Warren A. Estis and Jeffrey Turkel, partners at Rosenberg & Estis, analyze a recent dismissal of an overcharge complaint where DHCR, as affirmed by the New York County Supreme Court, held that the tenant had failed to prove that a variety of inconsistencies in the rental history amounted to fraud, and therefore the agency could not look beyond the four-year look back period.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to The New York Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.