New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Judge Levies $200,000 in Sanctions for Filing of Frivolous Patent Case

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Judge Levies $200,000 in Sanctions for Filing of Frivolous Patent Case

By Sheri Qualters Contact All Articles 

The National Law Journal

February 26, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Related Items

  • Source Vagabond Systems v. Hydrapak, 11 Civ. 5379

The law firm of Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer and two of its partners have been hit with more than $200,000 in sanctions for filing a frivolous patent case, opposing an earlier sanctions ruling and, according to a federal judge in Manhattan, wasting the court's time.

On Feb. 21, Southern District Judge Colleen McMahon (See Profile) ordered the legal team for plaintiff Source Vagabond Systems Ltd. to pay $200,054 in sanctions to defendant Hydrapak Inc.

Pearl Cohen and partners Clyde Shuman and Guy Yonay were sanctioned $187,308 to Hydrapak for attorney fees and costs to defend the case, plus $12,745 to rebut Source's motion for reconsideration of the sanctions.

Source sued Hydrapak in August 2011 over its design for a water storage reservoir used in sports backpacks.

In April 2012, McMahon granted Hydrapak's summary judgment motion for noninfringement and denied Source's cross-motion for summary judgment for infringement.

She also issued a rare ruling granting Hydrapak's motion for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

McMahon then referred the case to Magistrate Judge James Cott (See Profile) for a hearing on the sanctions amount and took the case back to issue the order.

McMahon disagreed with Cott's assessment that the sanction amount should exclude Hydrapak's fees to oppose Source's motion for partial reconsideration of the sanctions. McMahon wrote that "a motion for reconsideration of a court's decision awarding sanctions is part of the motion for sanctions" and falls within the ambit of Rule 11.

"The motion for reconsideration itself was frivolous. The court's statement that Source's counsel's conduct does not approach the egregiousness of the conduct of attorneys in other cases in no way undermines its conclusion that this case was not close on the merits and lacked any arguable basis in fact," McMahon wrote in Source Vagabond Systems v. Hydrapak, 11-cv-5379.

She also said the reconsideration motion "required this court to expend additional time on a case that it had already dismissed as frivolous."

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Davis Wright Tremaine

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Federal Rules
  • Hydrapak
  • Source Vagabond Systems
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Stop-and-Frisk Judge Relishes Her Independence
    •      
  2. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  3. Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation
    •      
  4. Trial Founders on 'Personality Issues' Between Judge, Counsel
    •      
  5. City Defends Heavy Use of Stop-and-Frisk by Police Dept.
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Left Without Coverage for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Circuit Reinstates Lawsuit by Inmate Over Cell Conditions
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Custody Ruling in Bitter Fight May Turn on 11-Year-Old's Wish
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Filing Blunder To Cost $142,600
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court: Injured College Student Can't Sue State
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About NYLJ   |
  • Contact NYLJ   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media