New York Law Journal
  • Home
  • News
  • Decisions
  • Columns
  • Practice Areas
  • My NYLJ
  • Careers
  • Courts
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Smart Litigator

Home > Judge Levies $200,000 in Sanctions for Filing of Frivolous Patent Case

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Judge Levies $200,000 in Sanctions for Filing of Frivolous Patent Case

By Sheri Qualters Contact All Articles 

The National Law Journal

February 26, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Related Items

  • Source Vagabond Systems v. Hydrapak, 11 Civ. 5379

The law firm of Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer and two of its partners have been hit with more than $200,000 in sanctions for filing a frivolous patent case, opposing an earlier sanctions ruling and, according to a federal judge in Manhattan, wasting the court's time.

On Feb. 21, Southern District Judge Colleen McMahon (See Profile) ordered the legal team for plaintiff Source Vagabond Systems Ltd. to pay $200,054 in sanctions to defendant Hydrapak Inc.

Pearl Cohen and partners Clyde Shuman and Guy Yonay were sanctioned $187,308 to Hydrapak for attorney fees and costs to defend the case, plus $12,745 to rebut Source's motion for reconsideration of the sanctions.

Source sued Hydrapak in August 2011 over its design for a water storage reservoir used in sports backpacks.

In April 2012, McMahon granted Hydrapak's summary judgment motion for noninfringement and denied Source's cross-motion for summary judgment for infringement.

She also issued a rare ruling granting Hydrapak's motion for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

McMahon then referred the case to Magistrate Judge James Cott (See Profile) for a hearing on the sanctions amount and took the case back to issue the order.

McMahon disagreed with Cott's assessment that the sanction amount should exclude Hydrapak's fees to oppose Source's motion for partial reconsideration of the sanctions. McMahon wrote that "a motion for reconsideration of a court's decision awarding sanctions is part of the motion for sanctions" and falls within the ambit of Rule 11.

"The motion for reconsideration itself was frivolous. The court's statement that Source's counsel's conduct does not approach the egregiousness of the conduct of attorneys in other cases in no way undermines its conclusion that this case was not close on the merits and lacked any arguable basis in fact," McMahon wrote in Source Vagabond Systems v. Hydrapak, 11-cv-5379.

She also said the reconsideration motion "required this court to expend additional time on a case that it had already dismissed as frivolous."

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Davis Wright Tremaine

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Federal Rules
  • Hydrapak
  • Source Vagabond Systems
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Departure of President Leaves Dean in Charge at Brooklyn Law
    •      
  2. NYLJ 100
    •      
  3. Lawyers' Pro Bono Hours, Contributions, Will Be Public
    •      
  4. NYLJ 100: Regional Firm Growth Outpaces Larger Firms in 2012
    •      
  5. City and Clinic Spar Over Bill for Law Student Representation
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About NYLJ   |
  • Contact NYLJ   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media